%202.svg)
Over the last decade, 23 high-profile cyberattacks against Operational Technology (OT) and Critical Infrastructure have caused blackouts, plant shutdowns, contaminated water scares, safety system failures, and billions of dollars in economic damage.
From the Ukraine power grid attacks to Triton, Oldsmar, Colonial Pipeline, JBS, Maersk, and beyond, these incidents are often described as inevitable, sophisticated, or the cost of doing business in a connected world. They weren’t.
Every one of these breaches followed a well-known, repeatable pattern:
Hackopedia exists to document those failures — and to show why they were preventable.
Most OT environments are not failing because attackers are too advanced.
They are failing because visibility and access still exist where they should not.
Traditional controls like:
…do not prevent attackers from seeing, targeting, and reaching OT systems once an initial foothold is gained.
Firewalls inspect traffic.
They do not make systems invisible.
VPNs authenticate users.
They do not prevent reconnaissance or lateral movement.
When these controls fail — as they consistently have — the operational consequences fall on OT teams who trusted architectures that were never designed for safety-critical systems.
A recurring theme across these incidents is administrative convenience overriding operational safety. Identity systems shared between IT and OT. Remote access designed for office workers extended into plants. Broad trust granted to vendors, contractors, and third-party software.
In the Colonial Pipeline incident, a single compromised VPN credential on the IT side forced the shutdown of thousands of miles of pipeline — not because OT was encrypted, but because OT could no longer be trusted to remain isolated. In many cases, organizations shut down operations preemptively — not because OT was compromised, but because they had no way to guarantee it wouldn’t be next.
That is not resilience. That is architectural fragility.
The lesson from these 23 incidents is clear:
Prevention in OT must focus on eliminating the conditions that allow attacks to progress:
Systems must not be discoverable
Access must not be credential-based
Trust must not be implicit
Lateral movement must not be possible
In OT, availability is the primary security outcome.
Any architecture that cannot guarantee continued operation during an IT breach is fundamentally incomplete.
Hackopedia documents 23 real-world Operational Technology (OT) and Critical Infrastructure cyber incidents that resulted in operational disruption, safety risk, or economic damage.
Each incident is analyzed using the same consistent, OT-focused framework:
What was attacked
The specific OT, ICS, safety, or supporting operational systems involved.
How initial access occurred
The real entry point — phishing, stolen credentials, exposed remote access, supply chain compromise, or misconfiguration.
Where trust existed
The implicit assumptions between users, devices, networks, vendors, or systems that attackers exploited.
How lateral movement happened
How attackers moved from IT into OT, from one plant to another, or from monitoring systems into control systems.
Why operations were impacted
The architectural reason production stopped, safety systems were threatened, or services were disrupted.
What architectural control would have stopped it
The specific prevention mechanism — invisibility, identity-defined access, segmentation, or decoupling — that would have blocked the attack before impact.
Each incident has its own dedicated page so you can compare patterns across industries, years, attack types, and failure modes, and understand why these were not isolated events — but predictable outcomes of shared design assumptions.
These were not zero-day-driven, unpatchable, unsolvable attacks.
They were enabled by:
Modern OT environments require invisibility by default and identity-defined access, not perimeter assumptions.
That is the architectural shift this site is designed to make clear.
Reading about past failures is only useful if it changes future outcomes. If attackers can see your OT network, they can target it. If they can target it, compliance, safety, and uptime are already at risk.
BlastWave eliminates reconnaissance, initial access, and lateral movement — without agents, without downtime, and without changing IPs, protocols, or PLCs.